Broadcasting since August 2007, and reaching the number two position among online listeners on GCN in under a year, George Whitehurst-Berry has been providing an alternative to the Rothschild gold standard that dominates most alternative economics discussion.
For my past appearances on the show, see here.
His new site is subotaisbow.com, and its four main pillars are:
“First, we DO NOT believe in the INSANE GERM THEORY OF DISEASE.
“Second, we DO NOT subscribe to the Rothschild Gold Standard as the CONTROLLED OPPOSITION ALTERNATIVE to SOVEREIGN Governments issuing SOVEREIGN FIAT MONEY that DOES NOT have to be BORROWED INTO CIRCULATION.
“Third, we DO NOT believe in helping to spread MASS MEDIA DISINFORMATION by simply reposting Mass Media articles, such as in 2011 when a speech made by Col. Gaddafi CALLING FOR PEACE was MISTRANSLATED by the Mass Media as a threat speech.
“Fourth, we WILL NOT allow the Mass Media to set FALSE FRAMES around issues and then argue from within those frames, which is a CONTROLLED OPPOSITION argument.”
Epiphany – the bank should be referred to as the “financier” – the lender of paper/facilitator of debt($) . The person who takes the $ in exchange for a product should be referred to simply as the “lender”. Does that make sense? Or does it still appear that the person who takes paper for their product is paid in full? Technically, the bank does lend something.
A bank in Ithaca just borrowed 30k equivalent in IH. I guess I’m confused. People love their own frames don’t they?
Interest-free.
Yes, but it was borrowed, and it is how the bank usurps a community currency. The bank doesn’t need to borrow, it doesn’t have any money in the first place.