Here is the comment, reproduced in full, before it is automatically removed in a couple weeks, in response to Infowars.com republishing The Daily Bell article, Central Banks Won’t Produce Natural Interest. Notice how they predictably fail to distinguish between public non-BIS-member central banks (Libya’s until the NATO bombing, Syria’s, Iran’s — notice a pattern?) and private central banks.
“Benrod says:
March 30, 2012 at 6:23 am
“The gibberish contained in the above excerpt is only magnified throughout the article.”
Right.
The article itself is, in fact, gibberish.
It is written by a person whose job is to write articles for a banking website about bankers and the jargon and gibberish that the bankers use while using the same gibberish to blast the banks, bankers, and banking practices that caused the website (and the author’s job) to exist in the first place, all the while still promoting the perpetuation of the machine that created itself.
“Greenbackerism”
Does that mean there is “greenbackerists”?
Extreme greenbackerists?
And the history lesson is completely un-necessary.
“…Knut Wicksell’s ‘natural rate of interest’”. But who was Knut Wicksell and what is the “natural rate of interest” – and does it matter?”
No.
Creating a catchy phrase automatically means that the creator is a financial genius?
Critically analyzing the jargon while using the jargon shows genius, too?
Maybe the interest rates (“natural” or not) would be “better” (perspectively) if so much time and money wasn’t WASTED to have articles like this (and websites like TheDailyBell)…
What a RANT!
My fingers are out of breath…”
I first publicly questioned The Daily Bell on February 10, 2011, with Strange Bedfellows: The Federal Reserve and The Daily Bell.
If I’m reading this correctly, the author of the OP is advocating for national banks, and is keen to make the distinction between a government-owned ‘Reichsbank’ (the Funk version) and a privately-owned ‘BIS bank’.
Perhaps this is why I have picked up on some sympathies with Webster Tarpley, Lyndon LaRouche and other alleged ‘enemies of oligarchy’…
All I can say is if people don’t realise how, all other things being equal, a ‘national’ bank is in practise no more moral than an explicitly-owned ‘private’ bank, then I guess this is just another example of ‘waking-up half-way’.
http://consentient.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/waking-up-part-way-the-sleep-paralysis-of-the-constitution/
[...] my March 31, 2012 article, An Infowars.com reader realizes what the Daily Bell site is really all about, I pointed out how they are known to fail to distinguish between private and public central [...]
[...] between SOVEREIGN Public Central Banks & the NATION-DESTROYING Private Central Banks: (Click here) This entry was posted in Financial News by xanadu. Bookmark the [...]
You should read the comments on the DB’s article… Don’t worry, not everyone buys their propaganda.
Two new DB articles picked up by Infowars.com. Alex Jones’ team must think the DB does really great work, or they’ve got some sort of deal in place!
Why not contact Infowars.com directly, and address that?
If you know of a way of contacting them where my email would actually be read, then let me know — I haven’t had such luck, beyond article submissions to their writers@infowars.com account.
Have you tried:
http://www.infowars.com/support-tickets/
I tried their support tickets a few years ago and noticed one of my tickets was closed several months after the fact, so I can try again and see if they’ve improved.
But as for contacting about this issue, what’s to contact them about? I noticed three DB articles on their site, which leads me to believe even more that they’ve got some sort of deal in place. But if not, why will they care about the site referring to some of the articles not making much sense according to one commenter, or about them failing to distinguish between public and private central banks?
Have you tried using the phone book?
There’s a phone number near the top of the page:
http://www.manta.com/c/mryd0zf/free-speech-systems-llc
Thanks for future reference, but I never expressed an interest in contacting them on this issue.