From the September 16, 2012 interview with Dr. Steve Piecznenik (starting at 33:22), which resulted in his September 18 appearance being cancelled.
From his Twitter feed:
Steve Pieczenik @StevePieczenik
“Alex Jones just pulled me off his 1:30 show today. He was intimidated by the very people we talked about. no worries, truth will prevail.
8:36 AM Sep 18th“
And his blog at stevepieczenik.com/blog:
“Okay, no Alex Jones today! Just got a call from info wars, canceling my interview. I think Alex was intimidated by the very people and organizations that we were talking about. Stay tuned, more to come.
Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 8:30 AM 29 comments:“
Related articles
- George Whitehurst-Berry uncovers some interesting information on Alex Jones (fauxcapitalist.com)
- Why Dr. Rebecca Carley won’t be back on the Alex Jones Show (fauxcapitalist.com)
ALEX JONES EXPOSED
http://alexjonesexposed.info/
Wanna know how alternative and anti-establishment Alex Jones is?
His show is carried on the satellite network of Sirius XM Radio.
Read about this company here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius_XM_Radio
[...] 8) Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? [...]
[...] 2) Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? [...]
I think Steve Pieczenik is an operative .
Quite possible, since he completely downplayed his CFR membership and has no intention of resigning.
[...] 1) Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? [...]
[...] Before donating to Alex Jones’ Money Bomb, ask yourself why prominent anti-Zionist Stephen Lendman has never been invited onto his show, despite regularly featuring his articles on Infowars.com and both being regulars on Russia Today. Could it perhaps be because Lendman will be too outspoken against Zionism for Alex Jones’ sponsors and supporters to handle, just like when Steve Pieczenik was reined in for putting too much heat on the Zionists? [...]
[...] Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? (fauxcapitalist.com) Share this: Pin ItShare on TumblrDiggPrintEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in barack obama, catholic, Christian, government, obama, political, politics, Roman Catholic, soetoro, subversion, treason, video and tagged alex jones, Archbishop, bishop, Body of Christ, catholic, catholic church, God, Gustavo García-Siller, immigrants, immigration, Jesus, Juan Diego, Our Lady of Guadalupe, Pope John Paul II, San Antonio, Tepeyac, United State, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Bookmark the permalink. [...]
[...] 4) Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? [...]
Alex has slept with the devil to be where he is in the media today. 99% of the media is Zionist and for Jones to be where he is today you know his content is filtered by more than just him and his staff!
[...] more on Alex Jones, see my article, Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? Share this:FacebookDiggRedditTwitterStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]
[...] Still don’t think Alex Jones is gatekeeping for the Zionists? (fauxcapitalist.com) [...]
Frankly – Steve Pieczenik is more a gatekeeper – the same as Lew Rockwell or the classic G.E. Griffin. Besides – focusing on zionism is practically useless – who among all those millions of Jews is a true zionist and who is just a guy who is offered a better position because of his faith and uses it to get ahead financially? Recently Alex Jones even said that he knows that establishing an interest free currency would produce great wealth, but he thinks that there are dangers in that too. Who knows – he might be a gatekeeper, but there is still nothing 100% out there.
I agree with you about Lew Rockwell and G. Edward Griffin being gatekeepers.
You really think most Jews aren’t sincere Zionists? I would find that somewhat plausible were it not for the example of the Holocaust.
Alex’s apparent reported statement about favouring an interest-free currency shows his fixation on government-issued currency, which he is referring to, since a wide variety of local, interest-free currencies wouldn’t produce one of the risks he was likely alluding to, which is widespread over-issuance.
Nothing 100% about Alex Jones being a gatekeeper? See my article, An absolutely damning clip of Alex Jones on Zionist Jews versus Mexicans. http://fauxcapitalist.com/2012/04/26/an-absolutely-damning-clip-of-alex-jones-on-zionist-jews-versus-mexicans/
Maybe you should talk with some young people living in Isreal or people having family there and how fed up with THEIR system they are in this deliberate fester-hole Isreal that was created by the so called NWO. And no matter whether some Holocoust numbers or certain facts stand to be corrected – a great many Jews died there – I have plenty of family witnesses who lived through it and saw it happening.
The Mexican clip was taken out of context and as far as Jew-bashing goes – it does not help. THEY killed many of them during the Holocoust and they are the architects of the current state of Isreal which could be easily at peace with all its neighbours. The Isreali people suffer through countless false-flags of their own.
And as far as leading figures in American politics go – there are plenty of protestants, catholics etc. there – just like there are many Japanese Zaibatsus actively cooperating with the Big Agenda and now many Chinese. So what if some of the bigger banking families are Jewish, or should I rather say were – since most are as Jewish as the usual Atheist born Christian. The discussion is useless and just leads to standard condemnation of a whole people instead of trying to wake them up.
And Alex just stated that interest-free currencies could produce great wealth, but are obviously not his choice. Rampant over-issuing nowadays should not be much of a problem if you are not a dictator-run African republic or 1750s wild-west colony. But of course that is only a fairy-tale solution that will likely never happen anyway.
And as far as gatekeeper-accusations go – the facts given by you are not conclusive. Ever more conclusive is maybe the fact that he leads the people to dead-end solutions like Austrian economics, Ron Paul and now Gary Johnson. If in 20 years he will still offer rather dead-end solutions instead of backing for example Bill Still for president (was a candidate for the Liberterian party) then it is obviously more conclusive. Still a lot of useful truth being given in his show. People have to think for themselves.
But you also have to acknowledge that there are many anti-NWO-activists who just become plain antisemitics, all-immigration-hating-fanatics, anti-Satanist mad-eyed Christians, anti-Satanist extreme Muslims and many shades in between even among the prominent members of the “Alternative” community. However we should all realize that we should overlook our differences and focus on the fact that we are not part of the 7000-50000 elite owner-families and probably not some of the couple million cooperating high-level serfs or wealthy-enough billionaires/multi-millionaires out there. I do not give it much chance frankly, but if there is one hope, then it lies in our all cooperation in waking up more people and peacefully making THEM back off. Otherwise the only other chance I can think of is a sympathethic alien race who will conquer the planet. One who is preferrably so kind as not to kill 95% of us as OUR OWN RULERS are planning to do. In my opinion the likelihood for the global wake-up and coordinated resistance are only slightly higher than for the alien invasion.
[...] (Click here) This entry was posted in World Events by xanadu. Bookmark the permalink. [...]
I can’t blame anyone for backing down when their lives and those of their family/friends are endangered. If this is the case then i don’t have a problem with this. It would be nice if he could be more up front about this though.
“Being intimidated” is very different from being the willing gatekeeper that your article suggests.
You raise an important point, Rex.
Either Alex Jones is a real threat and has been credibly threatened, or he isn’t a real threat, and hasn’t.
If he has been credibly threatened, then I can understand the decision to not speak out about certain things, but only in the context of making it clear to his listeners and not making false representations such as being “at the tip of the spear” of the resistance.
I discussed this issue on my August 5 show at http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Jason_Erb/Jason_Erb.2012-08-05_16k.mp3.