From the November 15, 2012 Toronto Star article, Woman denied haircut goes to Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, in Canada’s largest newspaper, I posted the following comment:
“Private property rights
Why is a store owner required to do something on his own property against his will? It’s too bad that he’s challenging this on religious freedom, when it should be a matter of private property rights — to do with your own property as you wish, so long as you’re not depriving anyone else of their rights. And it’s not anyone’s right to get a haircut at a particular barber shop.
Nov 15, 2012 9:48 AM Agree (68) Disagree (22)”
After 13 hours, my comment is the 13th-highest-rated among over 600 comments. I’m pleasantly heartened to see the message of private property rights resonate with so many readers, given the false frame of the article in portraying it as a matter of gender equality vs. religious freedom.
[...] I wrote the article, Canadians recognize the importance of private property rights, about online readers of Canada’s largest newspaper, the Toronto Star, recognizing the [...]
[...] 1) Canadians recognize the importance of private property rights 2) Joe Rogan interviews Dr. Peter Duesberg on the AIDS scam 3) Coast to Coast AM more Jewish Zionist than Christian Zionist 4) It’s official: The Daily Bell lied about their website numbers [...]
There is no legal instrument operating in what is believed to be “Canada”, that protects and guarantees our 3rd Natural Right to “one’s own property”.
The so-called “Canadian” Charter of Rights and Freedoms (is actually a British Statute and legally, only exists on the Statute Books of the United Kingdom) does not protect property Rights. All “government” created Human Rights Tribunals only deal with matters involving “discrimination” and none of your other Human Rights derived from our 3 Natural Human Rights, “life, “liberty” and “property”.