On September 16, 2011, I fired the opening salvo of my public appeal to George Noory of Coast to Coast AM to cover the $300 billion AIDS scam, after I realized that Noory has been deliberately gatekeeping the AIDS scam, yet found time to give three hours of coverage to the far less significant matter of Lyme Disease.
Here are my private emails to George Noory, all with no response, demonstrating his willful indifference to those suffering from the AIDS scam, with the added irony and hypocrisy of him signing the Mbeki petition, which states:
“In science, no theory should be immune from challenge, and debate over an issue affecting millions of lives should never be declared over. I support South African President Thabo Mbeki’s intention to investigate the definition, causation, treatment and prevention of “AIDS”.“
February 21, 2008
Hi George.
I’ve got a great guest idea for a follow-up show to Henry Bauer’s appearance on August 27, 2007 arguing that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
His name is Peter Duesberg, Professor of Molecular Biology at UC Berkeley. He is a pioneer and leading scientist in the field of virology. He was the first scientist to make the case since 1987 both publically and in respected scientific journals that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. He has instead proposed, with much supporting evidence, that recreational drugs, and ironically, the drugs used to treat AIDS itself, are a cause of AIDS.
I have been in contact with him recently and he would very much like an opportunity to appear as a guest on the show.
Looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Best regards,
Jason Erb
July 19, 2008
George, I read your latest Coast Chat on the 8th and you responded to a guest’s question about the rudeness of Matt Savinar in being overly aggressive with you and disrespecting your view on abiotic oil, as if he knew everything and you were a biotic oil denialist.
I heard that show myself, and that browbeating is a typical experience for those who question mainstream HIV/AIDS dogma as opposed to a respectful exchange of evidence.
I hope that you will have Henry Bauer or another AIDS rethinker on the show again, now having personally experienced the same attacks and disrespect that the HIV/AIDS Rethinker community regularly experiences such as being called ‘AIDS denialists’.
See Bauer’s 5-page article published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Physicians and Surgeons several months after his appearance on Coast for an expose of the mainstream’s behaviour. http://www.jpands.org/vol12no4/bauer.pdf
Thanks
September 15, 2011 – the day before going public, and being ignored again
George,
Your guest last night had things to say about the medical establishment’s appalling handling of Lyme Disease that are eerily parallel to HIV/AIDS. When will you end your gatekeeping of HIV/AIDS? There are over 300 individuals with MDs and 600 with PhDs who have publicly expressed their call for a reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS theory, and their voices aren’t being heard in the mass media for the same reasons Lyme disease isn’t being adequately addressed.
Jason
December 28, 2012
“Michael Rivero joins John B. Wells for a conversation about media censorship”
What about C2C’s own censorship of the $300-billion AIDS scam? Three hours for Lyme Disease in 2011 with only a few minutes allocated to Dr. Henry Bauer since 2007, and the rest of the time mixing it in with talk of Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster?
Jason
For more on George Noory’s gatekeeping of the AIDS scam, see my articles here.

[…] 3) George Noory’s willful indifference to those suffering from the AIDS scam […]
[...] For more on George Noory’s outrageous hypocrisy, see my article, George Noory’s willful indifference to those suffering from the AIDS scam. [...]
[...] 8) George Noory’s willful indifference to those suffering from the AIDS scam [...]
[...] (Here) [...]
The reason he is not replying to you is it’s a waste of time, and so would it be a waste of bandwidth to give a mic to AIDS scam kooks. Complaining about AZT is an outdated argument, as AZT was just the first medicine developed, but hasn’t been the best medicine available for decades. I would be dead if it wasn’t for Atripla. When I started antiretroviral treatment I was near death. I had a viral load (the amount of virus present in a blood test) in the 100′s of thousands and a CD4 count (the type of blood cell HIV infects and thus kills) in single digits. Within a year of treatment I had recovered and I had an undetectable viral load and my CD4 count was back up into the hundreds at a safe level. I have maintained those good numbers for years on treatment. I wasn’t on street drugs either. Saying street drugs are the direct cause of AIDS is asinine. The only connection street drugs have to the spread of HIV infection is that drug shooters often share needles, so they’re directly injecting infected blood from one person into another.
It’s not about me, it’s about his 3 million weekly listeners and the tens of millions who have been affected by the AIDS scam.
Another commenter brought up AZT, and while it’s not used in the doses it once was, it’s still in some of the cocktail drugs.
The viral load test you mention is based on PCR which wasn’t designed to quantify anything — it’s only designed to amplify something, as said by AIDS dissident and PCR inventor, Dr. Kary Mullis, himself.
Good that you feel good by taking the drugs — just don’t take my money or anyone else’s to pay for them.
If you want to complain about Medicaid and Medicare, then that’s a whole other subject. You’ll have to lodge that complaint with the ghost of LBJ, who set up the American system of healthcare socialism, which we have ALL paid into. So I’m getting MY MONEY back, for health insurance I involuntarily paid into my whole working life, through Federal and State income taxes and the Medicare tax.
As for my health, I don’t just “feel good” by taking my meds. I have recovered. I have a high white blood cell count and don’t get infections anymore. In Western society, people still have sex without condoms, and people still get high. That hasn’t changed, but there is no longer an AIDS epidemic in the West. Why is that? What has changed is that effective treatments have gradually been developed over the past few decades and have the disease in check. But current facts don’t concern you. You want to continue a moot debate about AZT, a drug that is no longer part of preferred treatment regimens.
You can’t really debate someone who just makes stuff up out of thin air anyway. Such as you do by claiming that the viral load test is meaningless.
What I know first hand is that before meds, I was riddled with other infections, of the skin, lungs, and digestive system. I was sick. Drs. said it was AIDS, and showed me tests saying that I had enormous amounts of HIV in my blood and almost no white blood cells. They gave me AIDS meds. Sores, congestion, and diarrhea cleared up. They showed me tests saying that the numbers were now reversed. The “bad” number, the viral load, which had been very high, was now undetectably low; and the “good” number, the white blood cell count, which had been very low, was now high. That is what is happening all over the World to people on current meds, which you could learn about if you bothered to check with the majority of the HIV community on real HIV sites with real patients and experts, rather than crackpots.
http://avert.org/
There never was a generalized AIDS epidemic in the West, and now there’s no longer an epidemic among homosexuals and drug users because of less hard drug use, the fast track lifestyle isn’t as prevalent as it once was, and the AIDS drugs are less toxic these days.
Glad you’re feeling good with your choices.
That’s interesting. Well – the only actual health improvements that the current AIDS-drugs provide are anti-viral, anti-bactieral and also anti-fungal. Even AIDS-cooks as you so aptly call them (among them 2 nobel laureates in medicine and one in biochemistry Kary Mullis {who designed the groundworks of the test that was used to diagnose you by the way} as well as doctors like Dr. Koehnlein and many others) recommand the usage of those drugs when you have no access to other medicine especially in developing countries. Diagnosis is a problem in the western world, since doctors cannot even recognize severe cases of lyme disease, candida overgrowth etc. which have tremendous health effects, but are not treated correctly despite the fact that easy and fast therapies are out there. Usually the strong AIDS-drugs take care of most real infections, fungal overgrowth-conditions and viral infections that bother that person within 1-3 months. This could have been achieved with a specialized conventional or orthomolecular treatment. As for the CD4 count or the so called viral load – there are plenty of completely healthy people out there who have the exact test-results and remain without any treatment for decades. Drugs in themselves in the Western world play no role since the poppers-ban. An exception are maybe extremely badly made meth-concoctions or other highly toxic substances (rat-poison derivatives, glue etc.) used for example in Ukraine because of a lack of funds. And as for your medical condition – without the positive HIV test you would have been treated by conventional meds likely with the same or better results.
You might also consider looking into orthomolecular treatments of HIV-patients – there are some doctors like Dr. Andrew Saul who have put together published papers http://www.doctoryourself.com/aids.html, http://www.doctoryourself.com/aids_cathcart.html and http://www.doctoryourself.com/vitamins_aids.html. Mind you Dr. Saul does not believe in an AIDS scam, but in very effective orthomolecular alternative treatments without side-effects.
In addition to the fact that even the Mainstream Media together with the medical profession begins to acknowledge “healings” of HIV infection –
Baby “cured” of HIV – http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324539404578338300521959748.html & Adult Male in Berlin cured of HIV:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/13/timothy-ray-brown-hiv-cure-berlin-patient_n_1881004.html
- you might consider embarking on an orthomolecular megadose-therapy treatment (without side-effects) which can actually “cure” you, even if you do not believe in a scam, since blood results will become undistinguishable from a “healthy” person. The above mentioned “healings” are not the only cases by the way. That way you can spare yourself the life-long treatment with the highly toxic substances (again in short time beneficial unless the person was completely healthy). But hey – accusing people of “cookery” is far easier than looking into the issue. Dr. Koehnlein had even discussions with other medical professionals in a non-emotional professional environment. He was never accused of “cookery” by his colleagues.
The problem with the RESISTENCE movement to the NWO is that we all have been lied to for generations that there is a tendency to assume that anyone that we disagree with on one point is automatically a gatekeeper, sellout, traitor and deceptive worker for the Illuminati. That is not automatically the case. For example I like and agree with the points of Duesberg and others, but most of them are good conventional doctors who use chemotherapy etc. Do I think that they are sell-outs just because of that? No – they just do not use the by far superior orthomolecular medicine, but at least they are enlightening the people on a specific subject on medicine and seem to be honest people. I may disagree with people like Alan Watt on some points, but if I can agree on over 95% and on 100% on what really matters, then you have the right kind of cooperation. So – obviously George Noory thinks that AIDS is a man-made disease designed to kill people, so what? He might change his opinion when confronted with some adverse data. Frankly this inability to cooperate and agree on those points that really matter will let THEM win. Despite the internet and the info out there – I think this will only postpone the final solution – we will need a miracle to stop this, since it is obviously so easy to divide us on some minor points.
Where’s the evidence he thinks it is a man-made disease? He also never let Len Horowitz on to specifically talk about that — he’s been an equal opportunity AIDS gatekeeper.
I don’t see your analogy to Duesberg and Watt. Both strike me as being sincere about their positions — Noory gives the folksy image on the air, yet he has deliberately worked behind-the-scenes to keep discussion of this all important issue off the airwaves of C2C AM.
Well – of course I do not know whether he believes that or not. Some others I respect do believe that. Frankly this is not concrete enough as evidence.
10 years on the air and he only had one guest on to talk about the AIDS scam, and for less than 15 minutes, when it was shortened after he found out what his producer had done without his knowledge or approval, and most of that time was spent talking about Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster.
Still don’t see evidence of his gatekeeping?
That is a sign that he does not believe in the AIDS-scam. Sure I agree – nowadays almost anyone can be a gatekeeper or disinformation agent.
I also think that Alan Watt does not believe in the AIDS scam, but rather that AIDS was created by the elite since there are some elite-comments made in the 60s and 70s talking about some new kind of immune-suppressing disease (he stated that on this show and he does not cover the AIDS-scam). This could have been Lyme-disease though (suddenly appaering in the 70s).
But does that make me think that Alan is a gatekeeper? Nope.
There are even orthomolecular honest doctors who have “healed” AIDS with mega-vitamins, diet-change and herbs. Well – no wonder – they improved the blood results so much that the test did not trigger anymore. But are they sell-outs? No – they just have not looked into the AIDS-research like Duesberg and others. Besides they would never have used AZT and the like to treat AIDS anyway and their “drugs” have no side-effects.
My assertion that Noory has been gatekeeping the AIDS scam is based on several factors, none of which apply to Watt.
1) Noory is a signatory to the Mbeki petition, calling for an investigation into AIDS.
2) Noory and his producers have been repeatedly contacted by myself.
3) Noory doesn’t let anyone on to talk specifically about AIDS. Another damning example is the number of times Jon Rappoport has been on, and never asked to speak about AIDS, despite his most investigative journalism being into the AIDS scam.
4) Noory cut down a scheduled guest’s time after finding out he would be talking about the AIDS scam.
5) Noory gave 3 hours of coverage to Lyme Disease, which is far less important to the world than AIDS has been, and don’t take my word for it — check out the number of deaths and spending since 1981. 25 million reported deaths from AIDS and over $300 billion spent just by the U.S. federal government alone.
6) C2C AM reaches a huge audience of at least 3 million weekly listeners, so it’s not as if AIDS is irrelevant as it may seem to many listeners of smaller, alternative shows.