Comments for Exposing Faux Capitalism

Comment on No evidence that your birth certificate is traded on any exchange by Captain Slappy

Captain Slappy — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:45:38 +0000

Dear Elias-
You are full of garbage, and a 2-bit shystering Carny-Barker pandering UCC & Law Merchant Legal Code and 3rd string, punt-return Legal Presumption Game Theory as if it is FACT, instead of fiction ONLY.

You see, dear sir, I just pulled mine…and it isn’t traded at all.

PROVE it, by FACT, SHOW ME YOURS that it is traded…or go sit in the corner with the rest of the kooks.

Kids…stay away from kook-tastrophe “Sovereign” movement created by the FBI solely to destabilize the system far enough, to re-vamp the legal code into the United Nations trash of “Human Rights” and their Star Chamber “courts”, domestically (since after all…the United States corporation HAS signed treaties just for that).

-Captain Slappy

Comment on The U.S. Constitution doesn’t say money should be gold or silver coin by bergness

bergness — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:19:42 +0000

By far the best money/currency argument I’ve ever heard/read. But, who won??? (I’m leaning toward Freddie Flint)

Comment on No evidence that your birth certificate is traded on any exchange by Elias

Elias — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:31:51 +0000

1. Go to http://www.fidelity.com...
2. Click on ‘Research’.
3. Click on ‘Quote’.
4. Click on ‘Symbol Look Up’.
5. Type in your Birth Number on the Birth Certificate with the dashes (e.g. 156-88-102939).
6. Make sure the top two drop-down menus are ‘MUTUAL FUND’ and ‘FUND NUMBER’ BEFORE you perform the search to find out who is trading on the FUND for the Birth Certificate.
7. Click on the Initialed Trading Company name under ‘SYMBOL’. This will give you all of the trading information about who is trading on the fund that the birth certificate is a part of. This document was created when you were an infant. Commercial laws allow for you to cancel and rescind this simple contract—UCC3-203—and to make a Claim in recoupment (Reparations) for fraud committed upon you when you were and infant (See UCC 3-305).

Comment on Benjamin Fulford scheduled to make questionable claims on his first Coast to Coast AM appearance, on January 30, 2012 by Elias

Elias — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:22:07 +0000

you guys are out of touch , without looking at anything fulford is saying, his message is clearly being stated by the many mainstream and some not mainstream articles on the arrests that are taking place, and also the people that are mysteriously stepping down from positions of power( new york times CEO among others) for no apparent reason. open your mind and realize jeff rense became a fearmonger when he refused to even consider that FUKUSHIMA was an attack not a natural disaster. please do your research. coast to coast is not really a trusted source. and george noory and his connections to other individuals is shady to say the least.

Comment on Benjamin Fulford scheduled to make questionable claims on his first Coast to Coast AM appearance, on January 30, 2012 by FauxCapitalist

FauxCapitalist — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:47:52 +0000

See http://fauxcapitalist.com/2012/01/29/an-open-letter-to-coast-to-coast-am-producers-as-to-why-benjamin-fulford-shouldnt-be-on-the-show/

My email may have had an impact, as the C2C website now reports as of 12:18 PM Eastern:

“Previously scheduled 2nd half guest, Benjamin Fulford, will be rescheduled.”

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2012/01/30

Kudos to the Coast to Coast AM producers if they cancelled the show for the reasons I alluded to above. Now let’s hope they allow coverage of the HIV/AIDS scam, so I don’t have to keep pointing out George Noory’s gatekeeping of the subject, and it can be ended ASAP.