Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘9/11 Truth’

Fakeologist RadioWith growing interest in my summaries of Simon Shack’s appearances, here is a summary I had prepared during the summer of 2013 about his appearance on December 16, 2012 on Fakeologist Radio.

17m – Dick Oliver, a veteran New York reporter, falsely claimed that the South Tower had just been hit, when it was the North Tower
24m – Pat the helicopter guy isn’t there in the live feed when he should be, according to the so-called amateur videos
39m – Said where Aaron Brown was was obviously green screened
41m – At 7:46 in Sept Clues addendum – fake story of Pat Walsh claiming there was so much smoke so they couldn’t rescue people from top of buildings
43m – Funny moment when Dick Oliver says he can hear sirens, and there’s no sound until 5 seconds later
49m – Maybe they used electromagnetic jamming
said Naudet film was probably made beforehand
54m – Tower 7 collapse videos also have inconsistencies
57m – New York reporter claiming he doesn’t know where he is, when Building 7 collapses
1h1m – Guy looks like pointing to something on a screen
1h3m – Toasted cars put there beforehand
1h7m – They suddenly released hi-res photos years later
1h11m – Famous Tower 7 collapse footage — whoa whoa whoa guy
1h18m – Willie Rodriguez a fake witness to say bombs exploded to justify white smoke on the ground in case smoke machines were used to obscure real demolition
1h22m – Completely different soundtrack, zoom in/zoom out at perfect times
1h24m – Independence Day destruction of white house from 1996
1h32m – Phony victim father actor, Bob Mcilvaine
1h34m – Bob as a 9/11 Truther, so it’s even harder to criticize him as being an actor
1h42m – Bob says in speech, he’s just an honest guy searching for the truth, and “it’s not about racism, it’s not about anti-semitism” — for no good reason to inject the matter of anti-semitism
1h46m – Speech is totally programmed – not spontaneous at all, despite the ridiculous claim that he’s being spontaneous with every speech
1h47m – Some silly 9/11 victim family names like Vanessa Lang Langer
1h48m – Donna O’Connor – mentioned odd point about “family myth” of her alleged daughter being pregnant, but then mentioned unborn baby as if her alleged daughter was really pregnant
1h53m – Donna mentioning about her daughter travelling to work in the most dangerous car in America – the Ford Explorer
1h56m – Donna blasts Bush again, but comes across as crazy
2h – Brad and Mary Fetchet of voices of 9/11 group
2h3m – Jersey Girls – most famous family members who apparently forced Bush to have an investigation — managed opposition
2h4m – Important point about group that’s already doing something about investigation so we don’t need to take action
2h5m – Deena Burnett on phone with husband – 3 hour battery on cell phone back in 2001?
2h22m – Mariott hotel worker claiming he heard an explosion, must’ve been a plane
2h25m – Rescue guy conveniently had daughter die in second plane crash, said she was born on September 11, 1990, gave up struggle for life after 40 days
2h35m – Limited hangout 9/11 documentaries

For my most recent summary of Simon Shack’s appearances, see here.

Read Full Post »

Fakeologist Radio

Here is a summary I prepared of Fakeologist Radio Episode 87a with Simon Shack of September Clues.

8m – Reporter standing so close to WTC — says take 1, take 2 — when pans up to top floors, it’s edited in
12m – Reusing actors
14m – “King Kong man”
15m – Simon said it’s slam dunk that videos are fake
20m – Independence Day movie from 1996 shows top-down destruction of the Empire State building
24m – Purported amateur footage has camera pointed toward onlookers, seem to be overacting
28m – Says he can prove that the towers have been inserted into sceneries
32m – From frame-to-frame, size of towers change dramatically
34m – First they released low-quality videos to conceal problems
35m – Now with high-quality 2010 FOIA videos, can see them — why released 9 years later if they existed back then?
40m – ABC behind NIST FOIA request
41m – “Witness” tries to have her jaw drop, then looks into the camera, making a mistake
52m – Said audio engineer of these videos should’ve been fired
1h4m – They had to have total control of the situation — all videos were faked
1h9m – Chinese Moon landings
1h13m – Said we have caught them in the nick of time, faking 9/11, before they can create simulated actors to fool us all

For the previoust show summary, see here.

Read Full Post »

Robin HordonHere is my summary of an amazingly candid interview with former FAA air traffic controller and 9/11 Truth activist, Robin Hordon, on the Kevin Barrett Show on February 5, 2014, where he talks about infiltration of the 9/11 Truth movement, and specifically implicates We Are Change as being infiltrated, and names Nico Haupt and Morgan Reynolds as infiltrators of the 9/11 Truth movement.

10m – Says Barrett sometimes get too confrontational with the likes of Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity when he goes on
11m – Military propaganda trick of equating free speech with deploying U.S. troops into conflicts all over the world
14m – Two groups of the 1960s and 70s peace movement were the ones who did want to talk about Israel-Palestine, and those who didn’t, and said they were infiltrated by Jewish activists who were parts of various rights movements
15m – Combination of Jewish activists in those positions and non-Jewish activists being afraid of labelled anti-Semite neutralized them from speaking out
16m – Said 9/11 is inter-related with Israel
19m – Orthodox rabbi said to him if Israeli involvement in 9/11 gets exposed, they’ll not only lose U.S. funding, they’ll lose the White House
20m – Said as you know, AIPAC controls both the democratic and republican party
21m – He implicated Nico Haupt and Morgan Reynolds as infiltrators into the 9/11 Truth community to make us look like tin-foil hatters — Barrett pushed back on him implicating Reynolds — Hordon said there’s no question (about him)
– Jewish-Zionist peace leaders saying don’t go into 9/11 Truth
22m – Said he knows David Ray Griffin very well and holds him accountable for this — said the dancing Israeli story was buried
23m – Barrett said professional gatekeepers prevent discussion from going across certain lines — like questioning Israel’s basic legitimacy
22m – He said we know the mainstream media is very Zionist controlled
23m – Guest referred to infiltration of the early We Are Change groups
24m – Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration”
25m – Conversation about 9/11 Truth with general public was thwarted by infiltration of 9/11 Truth through We Are Change infiltrators
26m – We Are Change guy giving 9/11 Truth message during Super Bowl press conference – said it was guerrilla activism
27m – Said he walked down the streets with Luke Rudkowski and he said they were “yelling at the sheeple” and off-putting the very people they are trying to convince, Barrett said they were probably having a bad day
28m – Said early We Are Change infiltrators did a lot of damage
29m – He said “I’m calling out Rudkowski”
– Cointelpro infiltrated peace movements in 60s and 70s by pitting groups against each other
30m – Said we are change confrontation snippets are not positive, and they’re not targeting the people we need to in the general public
31m – They turned off the public
– Super Bowl activism compared to code pink
– Barrett’s confrontation of Amy Goodman
33m – We Are Change guys said Adam Kokesh’s March on DC idea was stupid
34m – Said they get all the boys from We are Change having erections (figuratively), and it’s shown to average people who see that and get turned off
38m – Once you are receptive to 9/11 Truth, you never go back
40m – General public steered away from 9/11 truth after seeing early confrontational tactics of 9/11 truth activists
41m – Barrett said people in rural Wisconsin bars that he has talked to told him that if what he’s saying about 9/11 is true, they’d have to go to Washington, D.C. with their guns and take violent action
42m – Barrett said these groups are not all infiltrated, said Alex Jones has millions of listeners
43m – 9/11 Truth cannot be successful until 50-60% of Americans in the middle are reached in the appropriate way
49m – Adapt message to the audience
50m – Asked, hey General, do you really think a plane hit the pentagon?
52m – His sign outside the stadium, play more sports, cancel all wars, gets people to stop and read it
53m – Message has to fit audience
55m – Said the only people to accost him at his information booth down have been Jewish
56m – He’s only been accosted 20 times out of seeing about 2 million people
57m – Said the Jewish-American community knows they have to stifle the conversation about 9/11

For more on Luke Rudkowski, see my article, Why hasn’t Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change had his press credentials revoked?

For more on 9/11, see my article, Exposing Faux Capitalism with Jason Erb: Episode 51: Summary of my 9/11 research.

Read Full Post »

Fakeologist RadioOn September 14, I was a guest for three hours on Fakeologist Radio, speaking about 9/11 and the AIDS scam. The episode can be found here.

A good preface to my discussion was my September 8 two-hour summary of my research into 9/11 on Exposing Faux Capitalism.

The AIDS scam discussion starts at 2h8m.

Here were some brief notes I wrote that highlight the parallels between 9/11 and the AIDS scam:

– a few people at the top of the scam, controlling it all
– emotional, fear-based response
– public bought into it for reasons unrelated to science or fact — those who thought it was punishment for homosexuals, do-gooder liberals
– loss of livelihood if you speak out
– control of media is key
– didn’t even need to create dissension intentionally — it arose naturally, because of high degree of specialization
– govt complicity throughout
– doesn’t matter how many people are in architects and engineers for 9/11 truth — the official narrative has been accepted and upheld by too many — comparison with Rethinking AIDS’ 2800
– doesn’t matter if you have a few top engineers speaking out, just like some top AIDS scientists
– average people’s opinions don’t matter much relative to “experts”
– federal control by criminal elements within govt
– tie-in of official position of govt agency — NIST report and CDC
– obvious shills in both — horowitz with aids, ace baker with 9/11

Read Full Post »

9/11: InterceptedA Wikipedia search for Pilots for 9/11 Truth turns up nothing as of August 25, 2012. Why is Wikipedia so afraid of them?

An archive.org search shows their site going back to 2006.

Is it because they don’t want certain information getting out to more people, like the organization’s finding that United Airlines Flight 175 (alleged to have hit the South Tower) and United Airlines Flight 93 (alleged to have crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania) were still in the air after they were reported to have crashed?

For more information Wikipedia may not want you to know about, check out Pilots for 9/11 Truth’s documentary, 9/11: Intercepted, which I have included below.

Read Full Post »

From his March 30, 2006 presentation, which was way ahead of his time, in dealing a devastating blow to the official 9/11 conspiracy theory even before the release of Loose Change Second Edition Recut, and containing a few interesting tidbits I wasn’t aware of.

Read Full Post »

John LearJohn Lear, the son of the inventor of the Learjet, isĀ scheduled to be on Coast to Coast AM with John B. Wells on March 31, 2012.

John Lear is a curious case in that just like Erskine of Erskine Overnight publicly raised questions about David Icke’s sincerity, I have questions about Lear’s sincerity as well.

As Erskine pointed out, David Icke has done some great research into the NWO, but for many, his whole credibility comes into question with his talk of reptilians running things behind the scenes.

It is a common tactic of disinfo agents to mix outlandish claims with accurate ones . However, some seemingly outlandish claims may actually be true, and making outlandish claims does not necessarily make one a disinfo agent.

Lear, in my view, made some very sincere statements in questioning the official story of 9/11 in his November 2, 2003 interview with Art Bell:

A – Huh! So it actually took a fair amount of skill to plow into those buildings?

J – I would say that it took about 200 or 300 hours for each pilot – and we’re talking about . . .

A – 200 or 300 hours? But you mean of simulator time?

J – Of simulator time! They had to learn how to step into the cockpit – and that’s a whole thing – getting into the airplane, but that’s separate from that – they had to get into the cockpit and pull the circuit breaker for the transponder – sit in the pilot seat, disconnect the auto-pilot from the flight management system – turn the airplane, push the throttles all the way forward, find Manhattan – then line up on a pre-planned course – doing 10 miles a minute – they were clocked by air traffic control doing 600 miles an hour at 700 feet above the ground and fly directly into the middle the center of the World Trade Center. Now that – you know and the air races only fly 400 miles an hour and that’s difficult – but to fly an airliner like the size of a 757 at 700 feet – I mean that took some skill and that took a long time to train that – probably a year.

A – That’s wild (unintelligible)

A – But what we’ve been given by the media – by the mass media – you know – they were down in Florida – getting a few hours on lighter aircraft – that doesn’t wash at all . . .

J – No possibility! If you talk to any pilot that knows anything about this and that was – and that was a feat with the (unintelligible) with the benefit with 19,000 hours in all the airplanes I’ve flown including air races – the Douglas B-26, I doubt that I could have done that the 1st time . . .

But how much would people take Lear’s statements on 9/11 seriously when he was introducedĀ in the same interview as asserting that Venus has an atmosphere much like Earth’s?

John Lear suspects that Venus does not have the sulfuric acid atmosphere with an 800 degree temperature that we’ve all been led to believe and instead is a planet very similar to ours, but with a similar, but much more technologically advanced civilization.

November 2, 2003 was a critical time when gaping holes in the official 9/11 theory were unknown to most, including myself, and the mention of his beliefs about Venus and alleged advanced structures on the Moon no doubt made a lot of listeners view his statements on 9/11 with the same skepticism if not outright ridicule that they viewed his statements on Venus and the Moon.

In any case, it demonstrates that one must roll up one’s sleeves and sort out fact from fiction. Unlike 9/11, there isn’t much of a motive for some credentialed scientists to fool us about the true nature of Venus, and I think that we should take his statements on 9/11 seriously and set aside his statements on Venus and the Moon until he starts coming forth with extraordinary evidence for his extraordinary claims.

Read Full Post »