Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Dick Cheney’

Here are the Top 10 all-time articles at FauxCapitalist.com by the end of 2015:

1) Dr. Stan Monteith, a 35-year orthopedic surgeon on Jeff Bauman’s leg amputations: “I believe that this young man was an actor” (2013)
2) I’m blowing the whistle on World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes (2014)
3) Australia has $15 an hour minimum wage and is ranked more economically free than the U.S. (2010)
4) Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes (2014)
5) The U.S. Constitution doesn’t say money should be gold or silver coin (2011)
6) The United States isn’t a federal corporation (2011)
7) Who is behind enenews.com? (2011)
8) No evidence that your birth certificate is traded on any exchange (2011)
9) Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker laughs at the great increase in wealth disparity over the past 10 to 15 years, and at Americans for not speaking out more forcibly against it (2011)
10) More evidence that Fritz Springmeier is a phony: A New World Order colony on Mars (2012)

Read Full Post »

English: Denis Rancourt, Professor of Physics,...

On the March 3, 2013 episode of Exposing Faux Capitalism, I interviewed former University of Ottawa physics professor, Dr. Denis Rancourt, and covered the following issues, among others:

Hour 1: Canada to put the word defence in defence spending and Dick Cheney mistakenly thinks the 2nd Amendment granted rights. Hour 2: Interview with persecuted former university physics professor, Denis Rancourt.

Read Full Post »

Dick Cheney, Vice President of the United States.

Showing that his ignorance of, or disdain for, the Constitution doesn’t only apply to nine of the 10 amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, Dick Cheney said in his February 13, 2013 interview with Charlie Rose (at 41:17):

I think it’s very important we not infringe the rights granted to all Americans under the Second Amendment

Except that the Second Amendment granted no rights, and only affirmed existing rights, including the right of self-defense.

Further demonstrating his willful ignorance, given that he repeatedly swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, Cheney fails to realize that the sole purpose of the Second Amendment is to recognize the existing right to keep and bear arms as a bullwark against government tyranny, which is why the right to keep and bear arms is mentioned in connection with a well regulated militia.

Read Full Post »

Ron Paul, member of the United States House of...

With Congressman Ron Paul’s recent announcement of the formation of his 2012 presidential exploratory committee, my question is, will he throw 9/11 Truth under the bus again, as he did in 2008?

Regular readers to this site will know that when I use such strong language, I don’t use it lightly.

Here’s why I argue he did just that in 2008.

From the 2008 South Carolina Republican primary debate, in response to a question about whether he would disavow the views of 9/11 Truthers, he said:

I don’t endorse anything they say.

Really, Ron? You didn’t endorse them pointing out Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta’s testimony to the 9/11 Commission, which contradicted Vice-President Dick Cheney’s timeline about when he arrived in the bunker by about half an hour?

Is Dick Cheney a reliable source, when he claimed the office of Vice-President isn’t part of the executive branch of government, despite the very Constitution he swore an oath to uphold making the Vice-President first in the line of secession if the President dies or is deemed disabled?

Or the fact that a third steel building fell that day, which wasn’t hit by a plane, unlike the other two, and that the BBC reported it had fallen while it was still clearly standing in the background as the reporter made that false report?

Or at the time, the hundreds of professional architects and engineers with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, now nearly 1500 of them, who continue to question the official story of 9/11?

While he was one of the few members of Congress who courageously voted against authorization for the war in Afghanistan, and the 2003 Iraq War, would the American people have supported those wars without the events of 9/11? What about the clearly unconstitutional USA PATRIOT ACT?

Time will tell if Ron Paul really meant what he said in 2008, and whether he’ll throw 9/11 Truth under the bus yet again, or whether he’ll separate facts from conclusions, and get to the very root of the justification for so many of the things he opposes.

Read Full Post »

hatrickpenry

AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA

Recovering Austrians

Supporting recovering Austrian Economics addicts and their families

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury