Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Jim Fetzer’

Here is a summary I prepared of Simon Shack‘s March 12, 2015 appearance on K Ham Radio. For a summary of his most recent appearance that I had documented, see here.

22m – Simon joins
23m – Eric Darton’s book, saying that everyone was evacuated from the WTC buildings after the 1993 bombing
25m – He said didn’t find much evidence of deaths in the Social Security Death Index from the 1993 WTC bombing, that there was a thread in clues forum about it (only one of the six reported victims were found there — John DiGiovanni)
– He asked, who wants to kill 3000 bankers?
33m – BBC experts, John Schilling and Robert Schmucker — are they shills and schmucks?
35m – Fake photographers and journalists
40m – Fetzer’s gatekeeping – an early “no planer”, but never mentioned September Clues
41m – He was contacted by Fetzer to come on his show
43m – Hilarious atomic bomb test footage
44m – French guy who made a film about him being on stage and taking his head
46m – Getting harder to tell now, but you can still spot problems
– He simulated a plane going into the towers after a few hours when he was first getting into this research
47m – Question about whether they used state-of-the-art software or intentionally made things look bad
– They put red herrings in on purpose
49m – Said they put some squibs on the collapse footage – said he’s proven they are animations
– In Loose Change, they used the squibs to make the case for controlled demolition – serves as candy for conspiracy theorists
– K says she fell for it for awhile, and was amazed to think that they actually put them there on purpose
50m – They had to make it explode from the top because an airplane hit the top
– Conflicting information of squibs — not that many — 3 or 4 — red herrings for people to run after
51m – In 2007, when he was producing September Clues, he wasn’t sure that 100% of the tower collapses were fake imagery
– Confirmation bias – probably have psychologists running this psy-op
52m – Faking of jumpers was a very important aspect, since it would “prove” that there were people in the towers
54m – Said that was Michael Moore’s job, to make a movie for the theatres (implying he was controlled opposition, in order to make it out to be a Democrat-Republican thing, with Bush acting suspicious, but acting as a limited hangout)
55m – Said, like all Europeans, we don’t like firearms
– Admitted to being brainwashed
57m – In Fahrenheit 9/11, as plane goes into building, screen goes blank, and he remembers the same clip in other footage, of a woman screaming “oh my God!”
58m – When they do these psy-ops, they first release low-res videos and photos, so they can claim any problems are due to video compression, but then when it goes well, they release hi-res images
59m – Suddenly, in 2010, NIST released hi-res videos of 9/11, because abc supposedly filed an FOIA request
1h1m – 4 metre tall jumpers, when humans are normally only 2 metres — no human that tall
– Hi-res images proved even more that the imagery was pre-fabricated
1h2m – Some hi-res images were just better renderings of so-called amateur videos already put out by camera planet
– Nice blue skies, and suddenly things looked more realistic
– Sky on supposed live broadcasts are different colours – orange, green, yellow, grey
1h4m – In one video, north face of tower has light on it, when in another from the same angle, it’s in shade
1h6m – So easy for them to fool people with video fakery, because you have to sit down and really look at it
1h8m – No way that best TV stations could have equipment that could allow strange sky colours from helicopters
1h9m – They decided to have the Pentagon event, since they couldn’t have commercials
– only CNN showed the collapse “live”
1h10m – They said towers collapsed in 9 and 11 seconds, respectively – said they’re slapping our faces with such obviousness (Ed Note: this was the time they said the collapsing debris first hit the ground)
1h11m – Video only showing half collapsed after the time NIST reported
1h13m – Suspicious can zoom-in of “live” tower collapse
– zooms in close, and stops zooming in just as tower starts collapsing
– on 9/11, no street imagery shown “live”
1h14m – No imagery of people running out of the buildings
– Harley t-shirt guy, saying he saw the towers collapse, from structural failure
1h15m – White baby powder of people’s faces
– Said Rick Levanthal wasn’t there that morning, when it showed him supposedly on the street that day
1h16m – Reporter who just happened to be near the towers just before the collapse
1h18m – They had to show that in order to justify why there wasn’t much street action
– Laughable video of crowd running away from dust cloud, saying it’s very much like something from a Hollywood movie
1h19m – Smoke snaking its way around corners
– Films made before 9/11, like Armageddon, look more realistic than 9/11
1h20m – Where’s all the talent for this type of work? — in Hollywood
1h21m – Said the work was done by operatives, not people like George Lucas
1h22m – Said he considers 9/11 a gift, for giving themselves away, by overdoing it
1h24m – Those who live near him, in his village, are onboard with what he’s doing
1h26m – Norwegian guy who works with satellites, who nearly killed him one night
1h31m – Says he doesn’t think a rocket can go any higher than about 100 km
1h35m – Issue about not burning up when going up into the atmosphere, but only down into it
– How is it that meteors burn up, but spaceship doesn’t?
– What about friction going up?
1h37m – Asked about the Van Allen Belt, simon called him “another clown”
– Funny laugh by someone in the background
1h39m – Walt Disney a great friend of Von Braun
1h40m – First NASA administrator, was the former director of paramount studios
1h42m – Good question about how can it be fake if it’s so complicated?
1h47m – If rockets are so good now, why launch them from such remote locations? like in Guyana
1h55m – Said there’s no lens that can have a good picture of something on earth from a satellite, and it makes more sense to have the picture from a plane or balloon
1h58m – Said he doesn’t believe there are any satellites
2h8m – Said it makes sense that chemtrails may be used to enhance communications
– His friend who lives near the airport says he sees them everyday
2h14m – We never heard of ISIS until last year
2h26m – Bob McIlvaine
2h27m – When he cries about his son allegedly dying on 9/11, he does it the same way every time
2h29m – Questioned Abby Martin’s sincerity, and said she’s apparently a good friend of Dylan Avery of loose change
– Saying she started weeping, without tears, talking about some Truther dying a few years ago (Michael Ruppert)
2h30m – Crying the day her program was terminated, saying she was for truth
– Called it fake crying
2h33m – Buzz Aldrin living a lie
– The suspicious Apollo 11 post-mission press conference, with them looking nervous
2h34m – He was afraid to lose credibility by talking about the Moon landings being faked, but then figured he’d lose credibility by not talking about it as being fake
2h37m – Suspicious Harrison Ford plane crash story, conveniently around the time of a new film release
2h51m – Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize
3h13m – Video anomaly with planes, where dashcam 1 and dashcam 2 positions are 60 metres apart, yet the plane is in the same place in the background

Read Full Post »

Kevin BarrettI recently came across this interview of Nolan Higdon of Project Censored on his critique of Alex Jones on the Kevin Barrett Show on October 28, 2013.

It is ironic that Barrett rushes to Alex Jones’ defense so much, given that a strong inference can be drawn that Jones was the reason for Barrett and Jim Fetzer getting the boot from GCN after Fetzer started talking about no planes hitting the WTC buildings on 9/11, and Barrett having previously blasted Jones in his article, Is Alex Jones a Complete Idiot? on March 11, 2013.

It is also ironic that the show page for the interview has the trailer for the 9/11 thriller Operation Terror, about the underreported events of 9/11, which was blocked by one or more individuals within Alex Jones’ operation, with them not even accepting advertising money.

Here is my summary of the interview:

4m – Barrett said if you add all things up about Alex Jones, it looks mostly good
6m – Higdon doesn’t say 9/11 was an inside job
8m – Barrett takes him to task for finding it odd that Jones is getting onto big shows like Hannity, etc., saying why not
9m – Jones’ bogus predictions that poison the well
10m – Barrett says almost all his reporting on 9/11 has been good
11m – Barrett brings up Michael Ruppert allegedly making more incorrect predictions
12m – Barrett saying Jones is doing a lot of good by waking up people
18m – Barrett taking exception with claim that Alex Jones is turning a lot of people off, saying we should see numbers
20m – Barrett justifying Jones’ repeated false flag predictions, saying it could’ve prevented some, and it’s drawing people’s attention to the tactic
23m – Higdon rightly asks, why doesn’t Jones do something about things — besides bull horning
25m – Higdon says people tend to ignore things because of sensationalist statements by Jones
30m – Barrett says Jonathan Kay is either a Mossad agent or a sayanim (unpaid agent)
36m – Barrett referred to “idiots who bash Alex Jones” for not reporting on the accurate things he says
37m – Barrett kicked off 911blogger for one interview with someone who questioned the Moon landings
41m – Barrett said we can be fairly sure Chavez was taken out with a cancer weapon
42m – Barrett said it’s legitimate that Alex Jones is afraid to criticize the Israeli influence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
– Higdon said he didn’t have a strong opinion of any of Jones’ bias, saying it goes both ways with people having strong criticisms of him on that issue
44m – Barrett said he doesn’t think project censored is brave enough to cover James Petras on the Israeli-Palestinian issue
46m – Higdon said James Tracy ignored most of his sources
49m – Barrett said it was shocking that the article would only focus on negative aspect of Jones when the mainstream media was covering up so many important stories
52m – Barrett said for most of the past 12 years, the top stories on Project Censored aren’t the ones he would’ve chosen
54m – Barrett asked what if someone wrote an negative article about Project Censored
55m – Barrett said he thinks Alex Jones does a good job at what he does, and says he shares some concerns about what he does. Said if Jones wasn’t there, no one else would be reaching a mass audience.

Read Full Post »

Onebornfree is scheduled to be my return guest on Exposing Faux Capitalism, on November 17, 2013 from 8 to 10 PM EST.

With renewed interest in alternative 9/11 research from some recent interviews, the topic will be 9/11.

For these recent interviews, see:

1) Summary of John Friend’s excellent interview with Simon Shack of September Clues, November 6, 2013

2) Why is John Friend giving a platform to Ace Baker, who discredited himself by faking his own suicide on-air?

3) Onebornfree’s third interview by James Fetzer

O.B.F. was previously on my show on September 15, discussing anarcho-capitalism.

For O.B.F.’s 9/11 research review site, see onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com

Read Full Post »

Ace Baker

Ace Baker

Despite being into alternative 9/11 research since 2006, I unfortunately — or perhaps, fortunately — had never heard of Ace Baker until June of 2013.

From Ace Baker’s production, 9/11 – The Great American Psy-Opera, I clearly saw the video fakery among one or both of the famous South Tower plane hit videos (Hezarkhani and Fairbanks), with a puff of smoke coming out above one of the wing tips in one video, and out below the same wing tip on the other, with the video in his documentary corresponding to the earliest footage.

However, Ace Baker committed fake suicide on air, on Jim Fetzer’s show on January 6, 2009.

If that wasn’t enough, check out 19:52 of the second part of his documentary, where he makes the entire evidence he had presented up to that point look foolish in the mind of the average person already propagandized not to take alternative 9/11 research seriously, by showing a cartoon video of Dick Cheney singing and acting ridiculous.

Subsequent to John Friend’s excellent November 6, 2013 show with Simon Shack, producer of the documentary, September Clues, it has been reported that he plans to have Ace Baker on his show.

In the last 20 minutes of my September 8 Exposing Faux Capitalism Show, I went public with my identification of 9/11 disinformation operatives, including Ace Baker.

Given that, why is John Friend giving a platform to Ace Baker, who discredited himself by faking his own suicide on air?

From his October 30, 2013 interview with Onebornfree about 9/11:

John Friend October 31, 2013 at 11:38 PM

I emailed Ace Baker today and hope to have him on in the near future. I would also like to have Phil Jayhan and Simon Shack on (not together, obviously). If anyone reading this has contact info for either Simon or Phil, let me know!

I specifically made my opinion known to counter the perception among some that Ace Baker may just be crazy, or acting crazy, instead of crediting him for being the disinformation agent I think he is, hired by the same plotters behind 9/11.

This just goes to show that regardless of hosts having genuine intentions, obvious (once you know what to look for) disinformation operatives and shills can continue to get a platform to fool new victims in the phony alternative media.

Read Full Post »

Subsequent to my interview on the Real Deal with Jim Fetzer on alternative economics, a listener, Onebornfree, commented on my interview, and I have invited him to be a guest on my September 15, 2013 episode of Exposing Faux Capitalism, at 9 PM EDT, to explain his support for the Austrian School of economics and voluntaryism/anarchism.

Check out his Financial Services Safety site here.

Read Full Post »

Stan Monteith“Grandpa Liberty”, Dr. Stan Monteith, a 50-year veteran researcher of alternative information suppressed by the mass media, a radio broadcaster since 1993, and a 35-year orthopedic surgeon who has performed many leg amputations said (starting at 1:06) concerning the Boston Marathon bombings on the May 8, 2013 episode of Radio Liberty (emphasis mine and pause words removed):

I wanted to just call to your attention the Boston bombing on April 15. What really happened? And I’ll tell you, I don’t know what happened. But I know that they’re lying to us.

And basically, I know that they’re lying to us because of a picture that I saw on that very first day. It was a devastating picture. It was a fellow that had both legs blown off. A young man sitting in a wheelchair, being wheeled, certainly by a gentleman — a cowboy figure — who had a cowboy hat on and he was actually holding a tourniquet on the left leg, which was a below knee amputation, and there below, certainly, the stump of the below knee amputation, was the tibia — a bloody tibia — sitting and certainly, but the interesting thing is why the tourniquet wasn’t applied.

The tourniquet was just sort of underneath the leg, holding it up, it wasn’t stopping any flow of blood because there wasn’t hardly flow of blood on that side. It looked like there was some blood on the right leg which was taken off above the knee. But why would they take somebody who had just had both legs blown off and put him into a wheelchair? He would’ve been in profound shock. And why weren’t the tourniquets on both legs, certainly clamping off the blood supply? And when I saw that, I knew something was wrong.

And then of course as you know, I was a trauma surgeon for many years, I was an orthopedic surgeon. And basically, I looked at that below knee amputation on the left side, and it was a well-healed below knee amputation stump, and certainly, the kind that I would’ve done. I did many, many times, so people could wear prostheses. And there was no tear in the skin, no blood, no nothing at all — just a bloody tibia sticking out of the end — and it looked like it had been attached to this stump. Why would they do something like that?

And then of course, we’re told, this fellow’s name was Jeff Bauman. Some people said he was actually a lieutenant who had lost both legs in Afghanistan. He had a different name, but that gentleman had two above knee amputations, not below knee amputations, and this was definitely a below knee amputation, and I puzzled over this for some time.

Until, until recently, and you can get this on the internet, you can see these pictures for yourself, until basically, Jeff Bauman, 19 days after losing both legs, why, he was let out of the rehab hospital. How could that happen?

It takes a long time after you’ve lost both legs, you know, to get prostheses fitted, to get strong enough, and get the strength in your arms., but 19 days after the attack there in Boston, why this young man, Jeff Bauman, went to the Boston Bruins hockey game, and you can see pictures of him — go up on the internet.

And you can see pictures of him — he’s waving a flag, and he has two above knee amputations. Above knee amputations. Now wait a minute, the Jeff Bauman we saw initially had a below knee amputation and this is an above knee amputation.

I puzzled over that. How could that be, until I talked to a gentleman named Jim Fetzer who will be a guest in our programs and we said he was wearing a prosthesis, they put a prosthesis on him. There are even pictures where the prosthesis accidentally fell off, so they put the prosthesis on to give you the idea that it was a fresh amputation — it wasn’t, it was all contrived.

Look at the pictures, ladies and gentlemen — ask yourself, how could he have possibly have had a BK amputation in the initial pictures and now he has two AK amputations? We’re being lied to at every turn.”

Then, at 34:44:

Of course I’ve tried to call the Spaulding Rehab Center on three occasions, and of course, I’ve tried to talk to the fellow there in charge of the press, and he always says if you’re from the media, and you certainly have a deadline, give us a call. We keep calling and leaving a number and we never get a call back. And the only reason I can think that that is because the last thing they want is for the media to know that this whole picture, this picture that was implanted in our minds, and there was articles in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal about Jeff Bauman who lost both legs there, this is all fraudulent. And if that is fraudulent, then what else is fraudulent?

And quite frankly, we don’t know, ladies and gentlemen, if they had this whole thing contrived. And I believe that this young man was an actor.

Read Full Post »

September 11, 2001 attacks in New York City: V...

From the October 29, 2012 article, “Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle by Don Fox, Clare Kuehn, Jeff Prager, Jim Viken and Dr. Ed Ward (with Dennis Cimino and Jim Fetzer),” the authors raise some very important evidence and questions concerning what brought down the World Trade Towers on September 11, 2001.

However, why the inflammatory, unscientific rhetoric, such as (emphasis mine):

Steve Jones true audience may be the good people in the military establishment who would freak out at the use of tactical nuclear weapons on civilians. He’s probably not trying to convince the average Joe Blow on the street that thermite destroyed these giant skyscrapers. He’s merely trying to keep a lid on the use of nukes. This is classic CYA; he’s covering the assess of his buddies at the nuke labs. Nobody wants to get their government funding cut. Or worse yet go to jail.

So the Judy Wood bottom line is: no nukes on 9/11, no new investigation is needed and follow John Hutchison’s BS on YouTube or whatever. Don’t look at what’s going on at Los Alamos, Sandia, Lawrence Livermore or Oak Ridge. This is a recipe for going nowhere. She is a gatekeeper and nothing more. The efforts of her crew are coordinated so it appears Judy Wood is an intelligence operative.

Being stuck on seeing an (possibly) airy-fairy version of the EMF effects does not make one a deliberate disinfo person. In fact, one can see her emphasize things you people would only have majorly noticed — probably — such as the ongoing dustification IN MID-AIR of spires, with no heat-melt effects or flashes, if she had not pointed them out.

In doing so, she’s been emphasizing her stuff so long that though she’s always HAD room for nuclear EFFECTS, the regular bomb nuke idea, which was around when she started, DESERVED ridicule, and she’s GOTTEN STUCK IN DEFENSIVENESS. ——- Who hasn’t run into THAT elsewhere? HA HA ha.

Clare wants to think Dr. Wood is ignorant. She is not. Contact her. Ask to discuss my 22 pages titled, “19-42″ which I’ve linked in these emails repeatedly. She will not. Dr. Jones won’t either. One cannot, as a scientist, publicly make an ass of oneself and a public debate on those pages with me, or anyone else with a full understanding of the material in them, would crucify either of them and they know it.

Dr. Jones’ samples were acquired, handled and used in such a way that anyone, including Dr. Jones himself, could have tampered with those samples and as I’ve stated previously, no true scientist in his right mind would use them, yet Jones did.

What is the agenda of the seven authors of this article with such statements?

Read Full Post »