Posts Tagged ‘The Korelin Economics Report’

A "fiat" currency that lasted 500+ years

It is widely believed and often repeated that no “fiat” currency has lasted very long. By “fiat” currency, most are referring to currency issued with a dictated value without gold or silver backing, despite fiat simply meaning “let it be,” and doesn’t require or exclude backing by gold or silver. Most who disparage “fiat” currency fail to draw the distinction between interest-free currency and currency issued at interest by banks.

In his August 14, 2010 interview of Lew Rockwell, Al Korelin of The Korelin Economics Report said:

“No fiat currency has ever lasted more than a couple hundred years.”

The banksters don’t want you discovering historical examples of “fiat” currencies that have lasted more than a few hundred years, because they demonstrate that a middle-man who lends money out at interest is not only unnecessary, but a direct cause of booms and busts. Also, such examples impinge on their cyclical plan of presenting the gold standard as a false solution for a return to “stability” and “honest money,” after their debt-money system has inevitably reached its end in the current cycle.

From the United Kingdom’s National Archives we see the following description of  “thirteenth century tally sticks“:

“According to the Latin writing on them, several of the tallies were issued to Nicholas de Turevill. He was sheriff of the counties of Buckinghamshire and Bedfordshire between 1293 and 1296, during the reign of Edward I. One tally was a payment relating to royal forest in the counties. Another cleared some of his outstanding debts to the king.”

“Exchequer officials continued to use tallies until 1826, with very large tally sticks created to record huge sums of money.”

Here we have an official source describing one such example of a “fiat” currency that lasted more than a few hundred years — in this case, for over 500 years, from 1293 to 1825.

Read Full Post »

On the June 24, 2010 episode of The Korelin Economics Report, Steve Carr of Alliance Investment Group said in the first segment:

We really encourage people in their diversification, to consider silver above ground, because it’s never been confiscated in the history of this country, and own gold under the ground.

However, silver was confiscated by the U.S. government in 1934, with President Franklin Roosevelt’s Executive Order 6814.

In January 2010, I wrote about the historical confiscation of gold and silver as one of the reasons why platinum is the overlooked investment metal and currency.

Read Full Post »

There is growing talk about another confiscation of gold by the U.S. government as gold prices continue to set new all-time highs since 2008. I’ve heard at least three shows this week raise that possibility.

On May 22, 2010, Al Korelin, host of the Korelin Economics Report, had Louis James of the Casey Research Organization on in the last segment of the first hour.

Al Korelin: “One of them is the question of government confiscation, which is something I haven’t thought about, but more and more of my guests are bringing it up. I think that’s an interesting consideration. It has happened before.

Louis James: “It is something that has been done before, and not just by banana republics. The United States government confiscated privately held gold, during the Great Depression era, and yes, that could happen again. Our feeling has long been that that could happen, but the point at which that would happen, the point at which the government would even be willing to talk about gold being an issue, we would already see huge increases in the price of gold. It would become a public problem before the government were to take action. So there would: a) be warning and b) already huge increases for holders of gold and gold in dollar terms.

I agree with James that there would be warning, and a substantial increase over the current price of gold of around $1200 USD an ounce before the U.S. government is likely to confiscate gold again.

It is important to remember that if gold is confiscated again in a similar way to the 1933 precedent, there would be certain exceptions. At the time, they included:

“Gold coins having a recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins,” and “gold coin and gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate of $100 belonging to any one person.”

Gold then was worth $20.67 an ounce before the confiscation, and $35 an ounce from then until August 1971, which was equal to 2.8 to 4.8 ounces of gold during that time.

If a future gold confiscation is similar to the 1933 confiscation, it is likely that individuals will be able to keep a similar amount of non-collector gold. The way to keep all your gold in such a scenario would be to buy numismatic gold. That is, gold with a significant premium value over its metal content.

To really be on the safe side, you should consider diversifying into silver, and especially platinum and palladium. Find out why platinum is the overlooked investment metal and currency, and how palladium was the best performing precious metal currency of 2009.

Read Full Post »