Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘United States’

So it’s the early evening of Election Day 2016 in the U.S., and most polls are showing Hillary Clinton ahead of Trump, fulfilling the purpose I thought he would, as controlled opposition to get Hillary elected, as I alluded to on this July 16, 2015 appearance (starting at 14:45).

What tipped me off was back in 2011, when, after questioning Barack Obama’s eligibility for the presidency based on his country of birth was thoroughly discredited in the mainstream media, out pops Donald Trump to question it. He got lots of media attention like the View, and wasn’t viciously attacked as racist and a conspiracy nut in the same way anyone else would be, and after actual lawyers like Philip Berg who filed lawsuits got zero mass media attention. And then when Obama released a long-form birth certificate  that some people were also questioning on the basis of a Photoshop analysis, Trump suddenly dropped the matter, saying Obama was born in the U.S. (Actually, natural born citizenship was clarified in the 1790 Naturalization Act as being conferred on those born to parents both already U.S. citizens, and not conferred based on place of birth, as the requirement of native born citizen would have done).

And then, with his obviously staged publicity stunt dispute with host Chuck Todd of Meet the Press in early 2015, I was certain by the time he announced his candidacy in June 2015, that his intent was controlled opposition to get Hillary elected.

And his later behaviour subsequently confirmed it for me all the more, because of repeatedly doing things to boost Hillary’s demographics that she was relatively poor in resonating with compared to past Democratic presidential candidates, particularly Obama and Bill Clinton. Namely, women, Blacks, and moderate Hispanics.

So whether it was Trump making it sound to the untrained ear that most Mexicans were criminals (as opposed to the context of the “bad hombres” among the illegal immigrants in particular), or questioning the Mexican-American’s judge impartiality based on his Mexican heritage as opposed to being part of a “racist” group, La Raza, or musing that women may be criminally punished for their abortions, or repeatedly questioning Obama’s place of birth after he had laid it to rest in 2011, all those things served to boost Hillary’s flagging demographics.

A sign of what would come if he were to be elected, or of him not being a serious candidate, was what I hadn’t even noticed had changed until the second debate, when he had replaced his initial call in December 2015 for a temporary ban on all Muslims entering the United States so they “can figure out what the hell is going on” to his August 2016 policy of “extreme vetting,” which is a poorly named term as it makes it look bad, compared to the predictable use of moderate-sounding words for bad things, like “enhanced interrogation” vs. torture.

And I simply have to question what was the point of him repeatedly doing and saying things that boosted her problematic demographics for someone who demonstrated such a relatively polished image in The Apprentice in taking his time to make decisions and relying on the advice of his top advisers, instead of “shooting from the hip” as he repeatedly insisted on doing during the election campaign.

And there were things he said and did in the campaign that he wouldn’t have tolerated from would-be employee contestants on his show, such as saying that he loves the poorly educated. For someone who has repeatedly bragged about getting his degree from Wharton and saying it was better than even Harvard, such a statement was naked political opportunism at best, and nudge-nudge-wink-wink controlled opposition disingenuous opportunism at worst.

And when he felt he didn’t have the best debate performance at the second debate, he later blamed microphone problems, and that is laughable when you consider how fast he would fire a would-be employee contestant who did the same thing during one of their big presentations. Despite it being conceded that there was a problem with his mic, he wouldn’t have accepted from a would-be employee contestant to raise it after the presentation was over, and as a way of blaming a relatively lacklustre performance compared to the third debate which he excelled in. Instead, he would’ve expected of an employee in a leadership role the same thing he would normally expect of himself, in taking full personal responsibility.

That being said, to rebut a key smear against Trump, he is no racist. He has only implicitly used race as a purely political tactic, in my estimation. There was an episode of the Apprentice where he quickly fired a contestant for referring to himself as White Trash, because of the contestant’s insecurities growing up in small-town White America, and one of Trump’s assistants, who was Black, said that sounded very bad of him to say that, and Trump ultimately fired the guy because it showed low self-esteem. In a similar way, Trump never treated non-White contestants with any less high standards, and, indeed a Black man was the runner-up in the first Apprentice and would’ve won were it not for thoroughly botching the last competition, and the fault was solely his own mismanagement of his team.

As for Trump’s original Obama birth certificate stunt, that was a matter of him doing a service for Obama and dampening down any questions about his eligibility among any doubtful Republicans. His subsequent re-questioning of it in 2016 betrayed his controlled opposition nature in serving to boost Hillary’s numbers among Blacks, which were reportedly as low as 82 per cent in this recent poll, compared to 93 per cent for Obama in 2012, and also above 90% for Bill Clinton. It makes no sense, otherwise, because Obama wasn’t running for re-election and Trump was otherwise undermining his credibility as a decisive person in previously saying the matter was settled based on the long-form certificate.

Having said all that, I think that Trump’s corporate tax policy is the right way to go, of lowering the top rate to 15%, as it has already been pointed out that with various write-offs that particularly large multi-national corporations get, the effective rate is only around 18%. That would level the playing field for the smaller corporations and bring a big chunk of the estimated $2 trillion in offshore or uninvested money back to the U.S. and re-invested.

And for potential Supreme Court appointments, this is where Hillary would do the most damage, in appointing Justices in the mould of those Obama had appointed, who would continue their assault on the First, Second Amendment and Tenth Amendments, particularly, and read in false rights into the Ninth Amendment. On the other hand, Trump would appoint Justices in the line of Antonin Scalia, who would assault the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, in particular. On balance, Trump’s appointments would be crucially important, and represent a basis by itself of choosing Trump over Hillary.

And with his immigration plan, Trump is absolutely right to say enough is enough with illegal immigration, and to call them illegal immigrants and not undocumented workers. It is very revealing when mass media outlets actually try to justify the continued presence of over 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. by pointing to the most successful among them and decrying as racist when some citations are made of the worst and most criminal among them.

One of Trump’s glaring policy flaws, however, is his position on the Iran nuclear deal, where he has essentially been acting as Netanyahu’s water carrier and looking dovish compared to Hillary Clinton whose Clinton Foundation has accepted millions from Saudi Arabian donors, whereby Saudi is as anti-Iran as Israel, as we subsequently found out with her e-mails in being aware that Saudi Arabia was directly funding ISIS against Iran’s proxy of Syria’s Assad government.

After sending a private e-mail to someone in a discussion group who was supportive of Trump after he had made his official campaign announcement, and pointing out that I considered him to be controlled opposition, I’ve said very little, except for some online comments here and there, as it is ultimately my opinion about Trump’s candidacy and most people have scarcely been exposed to witnessing first-hand controlled opposition and sneaky tactics that I witnessed in researching and exposing the AIDS scam.

Just when there was evidently big support for an anti-establishment candidate, as seen from Bernie Sanders’ and Trump’s subsequent candidacies, Trump springs up on the scene as a big saviour. Fulfilling his role, Trump said so much that the White working class and other groups who have been getting the shaft by globalization and the mass media, have wanted to hear, and it is Trump’s billionaire status that left him uniquely able to claim that he couldn’t be bought and controlled by corporate special interests in the same way that all other major candidates have and would have to be, including two-time President, Barack Obama.

Pat Buchanan, on the other hand, I regard as a legitimate opposition figure back in 1992, and would’ve been far better than Trump on policy, not even allowing NAFTA to get off the ground. The very fact that he didn’t ultimately get the Republican presidential nomination — despite winning the New Hampshire primary and challenging a later, very unpopular George H.W. Bush — is strong evidence to me that he had legitimate intentions and purely grass-roots backing, unlike Trump.

Despite Trump being intended as controlled opposition to elect Hillary, I have no doubt that his backers (and Hillary’s, being the same), would be fully willing to accept him as a back-up candidate, and the great news is that if he somehow does win, it will become manifestly evident once you know which clues to look for, that he is controlled opposition, once he has spent enough time in office. Whether it is a matter of him assaulting the Fourth and Fifth Amendments in a way that even Bush couldn’t, or whether Washington will be more gridlocked than ever, or that he may even be impeached and removed from office, his intent will later become obvious.

I have to admit that I was somewhat shocked when he won the Republican nomination after facing a lot of initial resistance. But on the other hand, what good was he to Hillary if he didn’t? They had other candidates they could’ve used either to get her elected or win it for the Republicans with a neocon candidate like Jeb Bush, though they would’ve had to use more tricks. It was then that I thought that Trump could be intended to win as later controlled opposition as President, because he was no loser on The Apprentice. But then I was dissuaded from seeing that as a likely outcome by the fact that he would be okay in simply running standard controlled opposition for the sake of throwing the election to Hillary for the same reason that Bill Gates had no interest in running for President, which is that he wouldn’t have the power to order people around like he does in business.

One really good service Trump did, despite serving as controlled opposition, was to expose the American and even Canadian mass media as generally radical Left-leaning scoundrels with all the low-brow, disingenuous, politically-motivated and beauty pageant attacks against him as opposed to a critical comparison of his policies compared to Clinton’s.

If I were an American citizen, I wouldn’t vote for Trump, due to regarding him as controlled opposition, which is a shame, since on policy balance, he wins for me hands-down. May the American people make the right judgment today, and see you all on the flip side.

Read Full Post »

Here are the Top 10 all-time articles at FauxCapitalist.com by the end of 2015:

1) Dr. Stan Monteith, a 35-year orthopedic surgeon on Jeff Bauman’s leg amputations: “I believe that this young man was an actor” (2013)
2) I’m blowing the whistle on World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes (2014)
3) Australia has $15 an hour minimum wage and is ranked more economically free than the U.S. (2010)
4) Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes (2014)
5) The U.S. Constitution doesn’t say money should be gold or silver coin (2011)
6) The United States isn’t a federal corporation (2011)
7) Who is behind enenews.com? (2011)
8) No evidence that your birth certificate is traded on any exchange (2011)
9) Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker laughs at the great increase in wealth disparity over the past 10 to 15 years, and at Americans for not speaking out more forcibly against it (2011)
10) More evidence that Fritz Springmeier is a phony: A New World Order colony on Mars (2012)

Read Full Post »

Prior to this year, I had listed the top 10 articles of each year that were written in that same year.

But with my writing being relatively sparse this year, I am presenting the top 10 accessed articles in this year.

1) Joel Skousen’s critique of World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes (2014)
2) I’m blowing the whistle on World Bank whistleblower Karen Hudes (2014)
3) Dr. Stan Monteith, a 35-year orthopedic surgeon on Jeff Bauman’s leg amputations: “I believe that this young man was an actor” (2013)
4) The U.S. Constitution doesn’t say money should be gold or silver coin (2011)
5) The United States isn’t a federal corporation (2011)
6) Meet Gary Franchi, the radical Zionist behind Next News Network (2014)
7) No evidence that your birth certificate is traded on any exchange (2011)
8) Who is behind enenews.com? (2011)
9) Veterans Today’s Gordon Duff and his elite bio (2012)
10) Joel Skousen exposes Doug Hagmann’s “insider” source as disinfo (2012)

Read Full Post »

From this October 29, 2015 click-bait interview article on Alex Jones’ site, Coast to Coast AM host George Noory got roasted by most commenters for his phony talk of a presidential run.

Here are some of the top comments:

George Noory is a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” , he’s disgusting, a perverted atheist who
is constantly trying to discredit the bible with his new age mystical B.S.
Art Bell created coasttocoast and George Noory is a fraud that is trying to take
credit for it.

When he said he’s really consider Condolesa Rice as his VP, I was done with him. NO THANKS! If he doesn’t know how criminal she is, he’s not a person I want to see in.

OMG how did all this get started, with Noory’s overinflated ego he’d make a bid for POTUS, the only pit fall for him is the first time he makes a campaign speech he DONE. It wouldn’t take the low information voter more than 15 seconds to figure out this fool is a Clown…lol

the puke can’t even run a talk show. guess bigfoot will be his veep.

Snoory Can’t find his own ass without help from his “crew”. An imbecile at best

Noorys a stooge and has ruin Coast to Coast. he was a big part in what happen to Wells. CTM Wells show put Coast to shame…

Yet, Alex Jones’ crew deleted this very serious comment of mine, about him gatekeeping the $300 billion AIDS scam, which shows how they don’t really care about negative opinions of anonymous commenters, but they care very much about substantive criticisms that expose supposed alternative media personalities as gatekeepers, serving the system.

Infowars-George-Noory-deleted-comment-Screen Shot 2015-11-03 at 8.57.11 AM

Read Full Post »

There are still courageous scientists, doctors, journalists and publishers out there exposing the 30-year-old HIV/AIDS scam, and Patricia Goodson of Texas A&M University and the Frontiers peer-reviewed journal are the latest to aid in this regard.

Check out her September 23, 2014 article, “Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent,” for a synopsis of this ongoing saga, tragedy, crime and scam.

This article is particularly relevant with the current Ebola scare, to illustrate the tactics, institutions and individuals involved with the current health scare control grid in the United States.

Read Full Post »

Dr. Edwin Vieira, author of The Sword and Sovereignty, was on the Power Hour with Joyce Riley on July 28, 2014, and provided an excellent and concise explanation of “a well-regulated Militia,” with reference to the United States and its Constitution.

– The Department of Homeland Security is unconstitutional
– A “well-regulated Militia” means statutory authorization and regulation by the several States, and doesn’t include privately-run militias
– The definition of Militia is best expressed by the Constitution of Virginia, which is the whole body of the people
– Exemptions could be given to most for completing a first-aid course, for example
– Women originally not part of the Militia because they were not legally emancipated, but would now be considered part of the Militia
– Age restrictions in place (originally up to 44 years old) in the 1700s before modern medicine could alleviate these conditions, and modern society allows individuals to serve in other capacities, like office work
– The National Guard isn’t a Militia, with the proof being that there is no notice given to all citizens to participate in it
– The Militia is intended to “execute the laws of the Union,” meaning that there is to be no federal agencies that perform a police or para-military function outside of the Militia
– Police abuses could be kept in check by the Militia, which is composed of the body of the people
– Constitutional Militias could be brought in any time — the only thing stopping that is the political class and a lack of citizen demand for them from State officials

Read Full Post »

Australia’s ahead of Canada, in getting its first explicitly libertarian parliamentarian — Senator David Leyonhjelm.

It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, given Australia’s high Economic Freedom Index rating for several years in a row by the Heritage Foundation, with its 2014 rating of third place compared to Canada in sixth place and the United States as low as 11th place.

It sure helped that Australia now has an elected senate, as there’s no way an open libertarian would be appointed to any legislative body in a parliamentary system.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

hatrickpenry

AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA

Recovering Austrians

Supporting recovering Austrian Economics addicts and their families

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury