Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Vice-President’

Ron Paul, member of the United States House of...

With Congressman Ron Paul’s recent announcement of the formation of his 2012 presidential exploratory committee, my question is, will he throw 9/11 Truth under the bus again, as he did in 2008?

Regular readers to this site will know that when I use such strong language, I don’t use it lightly.

Here’s why I argue he did just that in 2008.

From the 2008 South Carolina Republican primary debate, in response to a question about whether he would disavow the views of 9/11 Truthers, he said:

I don’t endorse anything they say.

Really, Ron? You didn’t endorse them pointing out Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta’s testimony to the 9/11 Commission, which contradicted Vice-President Dick Cheney’s timeline about when he arrived in the bunker by about half an hour?

Is Dick Cheney a reliable source, when he claimed the office of Vice-President isn’t part of the executive branch of government, despite the very Constitution he swore an oath to uphold making the Vice-President first in the line of secession if the President dies or is deemed disabled?

Or the fact that a third steel building fell that day, which wasn’t hit by a plane, unlike the other two, and that the BBC reported it had fallen while it was still clearly standing in the background as the reporter made that false report?

Or at the time, the hundreds of professional architects and engineers with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, now nearly 1500 of them, who continue to question the official story of 9/11?

While he was one of the few members of Congress who courageously voted against authorization for the war in Afghanistan, and the 2003 Iraq War, would the American people have supported those wars without the events of 9/11? What about the clearly unconstitutional USA PATRIOT ACT?

Time will tell if Ron Paul really meant what he said in 2008, and whether he’ll throw 9/11 Truth under the bus yet again, or whether he’ll separate facts from conclusions, and get to the very root of the justification for so many of the things he opposes.

Read Full Post »

Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

I listened to Lyndon LaRouche’s first interview on Alex Jones’ show this past Thursday, and have the following observations:

He kept playing up the British as the bad guys in the world, which is laughable, considering it’s a globalist threat.

He referred to his alleged predictions of increases in earthquakes, presumably to convince people he’s either an astute prognosticator or some sort of prophet.

He said Americans need to get rid of Obama, since nothing good will come from his presidency, yet failed to mention that the same group of globalists who put Obama into the White House also control the Republicans.

He said Obama could be removed from office from the 4th section of the 25th amendment, but a reading of it clearly shows it requires the written consent of the Vice-President, who is Joe Biden, and obviously wouldn’t sign such a thing, so he’s leading people on.

He rightly, in my opinion, called for the re-institution of Glass-Steagall, yet mixed it up with talk about the earthquakes, which he says are being caused by a galactic cycle, which if true, is obviously beyond the influence of such a measure.

Now I know what Stephen Zarlenga, founder of The American Monetary Institute, was talking about in one of his interviews when he said that LaRouche supporters jump off the deep end with some of their proposed solutions. In this case, I think LaRouche did multiple Olympic gold medal winning jumps off the deep end throughout most of his interview.

Read Full Post »